Loading articles...

Family of Colten Boushie files lawsuit against RCMP and farmer who killed him

Last Updated Aug 9, 2018 at 10:20 pm EDT

Debbie Baptiste, mother of Colten Boushie, holds a photo of her son during a press conference on Parliament Hill in Ottawa on Wednesday, Feb. 14, 2018. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Justin Tang

The family of an Indigenous man shot to death on a Saskatchewan farm has filed lawsuits against the RCMP and the farmer who was acquitted in the killing.
Colten Boushie was killed after being shot in the head on a farm near the community of Biggar in August 2016.

Gerald Stanley, the landowner, was found not guilty of second-degree murder after testifying that his gun went off accidentally as he was shooting to scare away young people he thought were stealing from him.

The claim against Stanley, filed in Saskatoon court, argues that the farmer caused Boushie’s death through negligence, recklessness, or by an intentional act.

“This lawsuit will prove that the death of Colten Boushie was wrongful and that the Boushie family suffered a profound and devastating loss the night Colten was fatally shot,” lawyer Eleanore Sunchild said in a statement Thursday.

“This lawsuit will hold the person responsible for Colten’s wrongful death accountable. Nothing can return Colten to his family, yet the Boushie family will continue its relentless pursuit of justice for Colten.”

None of the allegations have been proven in court. Stanley’s lawyer did not immediately return requests for comment.

The suit argues that Stanley or his family members never attempted to contact police when they saw the young people on the property. It also says that Stanley’s wife, Leesa, is a registered nurse and didn’t take any action to provide life saving measures.

Boushie’s mother, Debbie Baptiste, is seeking $30,000 for herself, $20,000 for funeral expenses, $60,000 in expenses, $100,000 because she was unable to work after her son’s death, and $200,000 in damages.

Boushie’s family is also suing the attorney general of Canada and individual RCMP officers over the way they were treated on the night Boushie died.

The claim says that officers didn’t present a search warrant when they arrived at the family’s home at Red Pheasant First Nation when they were looking for Cassidy Cross-Whitstone, who was in the vehicle with Boushie at Stanley’s farm.

Gerald Stanley, leaves the provincial court after the first day of preliminary hearing investigating the murder of Colten Boushie, in North Battleford, Sask. on Monday, April 3, 2017. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Liam Richards

The family says no consent was sought to enter the home and that one officer grabbed Baptiste by her wrist and told her get herself together as she was on the ground, inconsolable.

“The search officers who attended the home deliberately engaged in discrimination by subjecting three proud members of the Red Pheasant First Nation to ridicule, unlawful searches, and humiliating breath tests,” the claim says.

Chris Murphy, another lawyer working with the Boushies, said in a statement that he expects the lawsuit will make the force “look deep within itself and examine the manner in which the RCMP interacts with the Indigenous citizens of Canada.”

The RCMP said in a statement that its sympathies remain with the family and friends of Boushie. The Mounties said that they are fully co-operating with an independent review of what took place.

“As this matter is currently under independent review and is now before a civil court, it would be inappropriate to comment publicly at this time,” the RCMP said.

Join the conversation

Please read our commenting policies

When can we sue those running guns across the Cornwall border?

August 09, 2018 at 8:58 pm

he was really a good boy…..check out his facebook profile where he states his mission is to get stoned and steal from whitey every night, and although he didn’t need to that night he was going to do so anyway.
Fine young man, from a fine upstanding family. (read the history)
All of the group out looking for trouble and found exactly what they were looking for at the end of a remote 2 km long driveway…..and for those idiots that said they were innocently looking for “help” for a flat tire (on the previously stolen vehicle), that was shown to be a lie in the trial. This, the third driveway they went up to steal from was “un”lucky for that group…..

give it up. your kid was a loser criminal who brought the entire result upon himself/themselves of their own complete onus.

August 09, 2018 at 9:00 pm