OTTAWA – A new report says Canada’s social fabric is being torn by rising income inequality and stagnant child poverty rates.
The Conference Board of Canada report compares Canada with other developed countries on 16 “society indicators” including unemployment, voter turnout, life satisfaction and economic and cultural yardsticks.
The annual social report card says that while Canada gets good grades in areas such as serious crime and tolerance of diversity, its overall “B” ranking placing it 7th out of 17 countries, is largely due to high poverty rates for children and working-age adults.
It also says the growing concentration of wealth in the hands of fewer people, and the fact that women are often paid less than men for the same work, are additional factors in Canada’s less than stellar social performance.
Author Brenda Lafleur says economic growth is put at risk with roughly one in six children living in poverty, and one in 10 adults also falling below the poverty line.
She says the growing child poverty rate — up nearly 20 per cent since the mid-1990s — could put Canada’s economy at risk, since youth who don’t benefit from the economy are less likely to upgrade their skills through more school.
Lafleur also pointed to signs that income mobility — which netted Canada an “A” grade — is becoming more and more “sticky,” meaning children are less likely to out-earn their parents.
But she said poverty rates and the economic and “moral problem” of income inequality are not insolvable problems. She said they can be fixed through public and political will, just as elderly poverty rates plummeted to the current five per cent from 30 per cent three decades ago after it became a national scandal.
“If we want to address a problem like child poverty or working-age poverty, we know we can do it — we just have to work together and actually decide that it is a problem,” Lafleur said.
Denmark, Norway, Sweden, the Netherlands, Poland and Austria took the top six spots — all earning “A” ratings in the Conference Board report.
“(Canada’s) position below the Nordic countries is not surprising; the Nordic countries have long outperformed Canada,” the report stated.
“But our country now also ranks below the Netherlands and Austria,” the report said. “Our middle-of-the-pack ranking means we are not living up to our potential.”
The United States placed last behind Japan, with both countries earning a “D” rating.
The Conference Board said Canada is a top performer in acceptance of diversity and above average in areas such as life satisfaction, income mobility, disabled income and suicides.
Canada needs improvement in the areas where it is “significantly below average” such as child poverty, working-age poverty, income inequality, the gender income gap, and voter turnout, the report said.
Gas Prices
680News Android App
Weather Guarantee
Advertiser Directory

Ryan, I absolutely agree with you. Is the solution to make the so called wealthy pay more? No, not at all. What is the criteria to determine someone’s wealth? A couple of weeks ago a friend of mine forwarded the following to me. All of which I totally agree with.
1. You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity.
2. What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving.
3. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else.
4. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it.
5. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them, and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for, that is the beginning of the end of any nation.
if you are not healthy and can’t work you should be taken care of, considering that you have contribuited to the economy when you were healthy and strong.
what makes the system poor and exaustes it, is the fact that a lot of people who CAN work don’t want too however they still receive welfare, and that also includes other benifits we have in Canada that affortunatly are given away to new immigrants whom apparently decide that they can affort a house so the government gives them one untill they can, but they are professionals with good paying jobs, how does that work for anyone. OH !!! wait !!! it does for those u s%$&@ with the system.
Not getting better for sure. When my parents came to Canada in the late 1970s, if you had a skill and were willing to work hard, you could get a good paying job that would support a family. I grew up in a middle class neighbourhood where butchers (my dad), construction labourers and hair dressers were able to provide enough $$ to afford a home, a family car, vacation and put 2 or 3 kids through school. That would be IMPOSSIBLE today. A house in the same Etobicoke neighbourhood now costs $600-800K and many people actually make LESS than they did 25 years ago in real terms. (i.e. purchasing power). I know many people with high school educations or college struggling to find work paying less than $30K per year. The story recent immigrants with no skills or English is much worse. There are 2-3 types of jobs now in Toronto. Government jobs paying well with pensions, some corporate jobs and retail. Unless you have the education and know someone, you’re stuck in retail paying minimum wages. The kids suffer in more than one way. There is more stigma attached to being poor today than there used to be in my opinion. I never felt ashamed wearing second hand clothes or peddling a used bike growing up.
In this country the Rich are getting much Richer and the poor are being forgotten abour. The price of every-thing has gone up but O.D.S.P. and Welfare checques remain the same. At this rate the poor will eventually starve to death or freese to death because they can,t afford proper clothing. Living on O.D.S.P. my-self and family , we have to wear dead peoples clothes from trift shops, donated by people that have passed away and we can only afford expired food . The food that regular people would not feed to a dog. Some-times I think we would be better off dead. Great country Canada.If you are healthy and can work.
Sorry John but I have no sympathy for anyone complaining about welfare not paying enough. There is work out there, the problem is very few seem to really want to work, doing whatever is necessary to survive, live at or below their means and save and progress towards a better life. Welfare was meant to be a temporary thing, not a lifestyle. I come from a very humble background, both parents worked and while we did not have much, we had a roof over our heads and food in our stomachs. I worked hard, took whatever jobs I could get (starting at age 12 I might add), paid my dues and am now earning better than average wages. I might add that what I pay in income tax every year, 46% of my earnings, pays towards supporting people that are on welfare and it is a sore point. Everyone needs a hand up now and again, and that may be your position, but I would personally rather take a minimum wage job, or work odd jobs, than ever take welfare let alone make welfare my only means of support.